Home - Secondary structure Comparative modelling Contacts Threading - search - FTP - Mirrors - Bottom Explain scores

EVA sec results for: Prospect month: 2004_07

METHOD about:	../../../doc/explain_methods.html#PX_about_prospect
METHOD url:	Prospect
TYPE :	sec
NPROT :	94
NWEEKS :	33
NOTE 1 :	here ALL results obtained for Prospect in month 2004_07 are given, i.e. NOT those for a common subset!
NOTE 2 :	all proteins evaluated had no SIGNIFICANT sequence identity to any protein of previously known structure!

Averages over all proteins month 2004_07 1

type	date	sots	id	Q3	Q3H%o	Q3H%p	Q3E%o	Q3E%p	Q3L%o	Q3L%p	sov	sovH	sovE	sovL	BAD	info	infoO	infoP	corrH	corrE	corrL	class	contDH	contDE

sec	2004_07	dssp	ALL_proteins:psum	71.4	75	80	63	65	75	70	68.9	75.3	71.3	66.7	4.7	0.32	0.33	0.31	0.63	0.56	0.53	8297.8	11.1	8.9
sec	2004_07	dssp	ALL_proteins:sig	14.3	35	36	44	46	15	18	19.7	28.7	32.0	19.3	9.0	0.18	0.18	0.18	0.30	0.33	0.23	8259.0	13.5	10.8
sec	2004_07	dssp	ALL_proteins:errsig	1.4	3	3	4	4	1	1	2.0	2.9	3.3	2.0	0.93	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.03	0.03	0.02	851.8	1.4	1.1
sec	2004_07	dssp	THIS_month:psum	76.9	78	86	31	39	74	69	77.7	84.2	86.7	69.2	4.1	0.35	0.38	0.33	0.63	0.81	0.57	25	4	5.7

sec	2004_07	dssp	1rlj:A	65.9	70	74	65	70	59	53	64.2	73	75	47	3.7	0.22	0.23	0.23	0.50	0.59	0.32	0.0	2.0	1.0
sec	2004_07	dssp	1s7h:A	79.6	85	90	62	87	86	68	85.5	96	72	87	1.0	0.48	0.47	0.49	0.81	0.65	0.61	0.0	1.0	8.0
sec	2004_07	dssp	1sz9:A	81.8	87	87	0	0	63	69	79.7	83	100	67	2.0	0.24	0.26	0.23	0.51	1.0	0.56	100.0	0.00	2.0
sec	2004_07	dssp	1uhs:A	80.6	73	96	0	0	90	87	81.5	85	100	76	9.7	0.47	0.57	0.39	0.69	1.0	0.80	0.0	13.0	12.0

sec	2004_07	dssp	THIS_month:psum	76.9	78	86	31	39	74	69	77.7	84.2	86.7	69.2	4.1	0.35	0.38	0.33	0.63	0.81	0.57	25	4	5.7

sec	2004_07	dssp	ALL_proteins:psum	71.4	75	80	63	65	75	70	68.9	75.3	71.3	66.7	4.7	0.32	0.33	0.31	0.63	0.56	0.53	8297.8	11.1	8.9
sec	2004_07	dssp	ALL_proteins:sig	14.3	35	36	44	46	15	18	19.7	28.7	32.0	19.3	9.0	0.18	0.18	0.18	0.30	0.33	0.23	8259.0	13.5	10.8
sec	2004_07	dssp	ALL_proteins:errsig	1.4	3	3	4	4	1	1	2.0	2.9	3.3	2.0	0.93	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.03	0.03	0.02	851.8	1.4	1.1

Notations used (detailed explanation)

psum	percentage over all proteins
sig	standard deviation
errsig	significant difference (to distinguish between two methods)

type	prediction type
date	date when added [yyyy_mm_dd]
sots	standard of truth
id	identifier of protein
Q3	three-state per-residue accuracy (percentage of correctly predicted residues)
Q3H%o	correctly predicted helix residues (percentage of helix observed)
Q3H%p	correctly predicted helix residues (percentage of helix predicted)
Q3E%o	correctly predicted strand residues (percentage of helix observed)
Q3E%p	correctly predicted strand residues (percentage of helix predicted)
Q3L%o	correctly predicted loop residues (percentage of helix observed)
Q3L%p	correctly predicted loop residues (percentage of helix predicted)
sov	per segment accuracy (three states)
sovH	per segment accuracy for helix residues
sovE	per segment accuracy for strand residues
sovL	per segment accuracy for non-regular residues
BAD	percentage of confused HELIX/STRAND residues (helix predicted as strand, strand predicted as helix)
infoO	information index accuracy (percentage of observed)
infoP	information index accuracy (percentage of predicted)
corrH	Matthews correlation index for helix
corrE	Matthews correlation index for strand
corrL	Matthews correlation index for loop
var	variance over all proteins (1/N-1)( score(i) - )*2
sig	sigma (standard deviation) over all proteins (sqrt[var])
errsig	significant differences ( standard dev / sqrt(Nprot) )

Last update: 2004_07
Contact: rost@columbia.edu
WWW: http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/eva

Explain scores - Home - Secondary structure Comparative modelling Contacts Threading - search - FTP - Mirrors - Top